Skip to content

Menu

Published by Charlie Goetsch
HomeAboutServicesContact
Search
Close

Train Law Blog

The Source for Railroad Injuries & Whistleblower Protection

FRSA attorney

Subscribe to FRSA attorney

How Not To Settle FRSA Claims

By Charlie Goetsch on January 16, 2012
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

No matter what a railroad may try to tell you, a Federal Rail Safety Act claim under OSHA jurisdiction cannot be settled without the express written approval of OSHA. Here’s why.

The FRSA itself states: “The rights and remedies in this section may not be waived by any agreement . . .” 49 USC 20109(h).

Judge Confirms Broad Scope of FRSA Adverse Actions

By Charlie Goetsch on October 15, 2011
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

In an important decision clarifying the broad scope of adverse action under the Federal Rail Safety Act, Judge Theresa C. Timlin confirms that the mere act of filing of charges against an injured railroad employee is an unfavorable personnel action sufficient to support a FRSA violation.

The facts in Vernace v. PATH Rail are:…

Bogus Election of Remedies FRSA Defense Finally Laid to Rest

By Charlie Goetsch on October 4, 2011
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

The long wait is over. The Administrative Review Board has officially laid the railroad’s bogus “election of remedies” defense to rest. In Mercier v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., the ARB has declared once and for all that rail workers are entitled to simultaneously pursue their rights under the Federal Rail Safety Act while also…

New OSHA Whistleblower Manual Issued

By Charlie Goetsch on October 3, 2011
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

OSHA’s Whistleblower Office has issued a revised and updated Whistleblower Investigations Manual that applies to complaints under the Federal Rail Safety Act. The Manual explains the process from start to finish, and workers and attorneys will find it useful to orient themselves as to the steps involved in FRSA complaints.

Two points of…

Major Decisions Mandate Full Award Of FRSA Attorney Fees

By Charlie Goetsch on September 19, 2011
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

Fighting Federal Rail Safety Act claims just got a lot more expensive for railroads. Two recent appellate court decisions confirm that—no matter how small a worker’s FRSA economic damages may be–the railroad has to pay the FULL amount of the worker’s attorneys fees and costs. The appellate decisions apply to FRSA cases in the administrative…

FRSA Alert! DOL Issues Major New FRSA Regulations

By Charlie Goetsch on September 3, 2010
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

As of August 31, 2010, the Federal Rail Safety Act has its own set of regulations setting forth the requirements and procedures for every aspect of FRSA litigation, including the filing of complaints, OSHA investigations, appeals to ALJ de novo hearings, review by the ARB, and optional federal court jury trials. You can access the…

The Disastrous Result of Railroads’ Reflexive Appeal of FRSA Awards

By Charlie Goetsch on August 29, 2010
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

The first two stages of grief are denial and anger. And when it comes to the Federal Rail Safety Act, railroads still are deeply mired in denial and anger. As a result, any time OSHA’s Whistleblower Office hands down a FRSA award against a railroad, the railroad reacts with angry denial and automatically appeals…

Library of Federal Rail Safety Act Materials Goes Online!

By Charlie Goetsch on July 20, 2010
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

Rail labor attorneys, union reps, employees, and even OSHA Whistleblower investigators: Your search is ended!  Everything you need to know about the Federal Rail Safety Act is now in one easy place.  In response to numerous requests, I have created a web page entitled Rail Whistleblower Library. 

This is a repository for information, texts, forms,…

Federal Rail Safety Act Retainer Agreements

By Charlie Goetsch on June 9, 2010
Posted in Federal Rail Safety Act

The Federal Rail Safety Act (FRSA) is a new statute with many novel questions, not the least of which is: what should the Retainer Agreement provide? Unlike FELA personal injury claims where pure contingency fee agreements are well-established, the FRSA is a different animal, with a statutory fee-shifting provision and a wide spectrum of potential…

Post navigation

 Newer Posts

About

Charles C. Goetsch has over 40 years’ experience helping injured workers recover under the FELA and protecting employees who blow the whistle on safety or fraud in the workplace. He has tried over 60 federal jury trials and argued over a dozen federal appeals, including a landmark case before the United States Supreme Court

Stay Connected

Connect on LinkedIn Subscribe to this blog via RSS

Recent Updates

  • Another Circuit Holds Subjective Belief Alone Is Enough
  • Transportation Infrastructure Fraud Whistleblowing
  • FRSA Alert! Landmark Decision Clarifies Good Faith Safety Reporting
  • What Is Clear and Convincing Evidence?
  • When Reporting a Worker’s Illness Is Protected From Discipline

Topics

Archives

Links

  • Family Medical Leave Act
  • Federal and State Court Decisions
  • Federal Railroad Administration
  • FMLA Law
  • Get Railroad Jobs
  • GoWhistleblower (Firm Website)
  • National Mediation Board
  • National Transportation Safety Board
  • OSHA
  • OSHA Whistleblower
  • OSHA Whistleblower Library
  • Rail Whistleblower Library
  • Railroad Retirement Board
  • Railway Labor Act
  • Surface Transportation Board
  • U.S. Code and Statute Law
  • U.S. Code of Federal Regulations
Charles Goetsch Law Offices LLC
405 Orange St.
New Haven, CT 06511
Phone: 203-672-1370
Email: charlie@gowhistleblower.com
Connect on LinkedIn Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

Attorney Charles Goetsch has over 40 years’ experience protecting injured railroad workers and prosecuting whistleblower retaliation. Charlie has tried over 60 federal trials and argued over a dozen federal appeals, including a landmark case before the United States Supreme Court.

Read More...
Copyright ©2023, Charles Goetsch Law Offices LLC, All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo