FRSA Applies To Intrastate Commuter Railroads

After a supervisor for the Utah Transit Authority was fired for raising safety concerns, OSHA's Whistleblower Office ordered him reinstated with over $150,000 in make whole economic damages.  In refusing to dismiss that case, an ALJ has ruled that the FRSA  protects any employee who raises safety concerns, even supervisors on an intrastate commuter railroad not yet open to the public:

Congress recognized that in order to improve safety and security on the railroads, railroad employees play a key role and are to be encouraged to raise safety or security issues with supervisors and/or government officials, so the issues can be addressed, without fear of reprisal for doing so. . . .

The potential safety or security issues railroad employees are exposed to are the same, whether the commuter railroad operates wholly intrastate or crosses state borders. . . . Congress did not intend to protect some commuter railroad employees who raise safety or security concerns but not others.

Amen. For OSHA's Merit Finding, click here.  For the ALJ's full opinion, click here. For the full FRSA Library, click here.

 

 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.trainlawblog.com/admin/trackback/241407
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.